Transforming organization, transforming countries Essay Example for Free

Transforming organization, transforming countries Essay The beauty of organizational transformation reflecting in the belonging countries is embedded in the leadership perspective to the emerging challenge at hand. This has to do with meeting the set-out goals of the company. The goals are clearly mapped out in the mission statement. The mission statement of an organization is a step –in and step-out tones on how to carry out an unequivocal vision of such an industry. In a changing world of ours with constant development of information technology and communication at the twinkle of an eye, it is paramount to establish here that constant ‘change’ is ‘part and par sue’ and a continuous process employed by the administration of the executive officers in charge. An organization needs a research section to constantly discover in due time, evaluate the seemingly problem at hand and the problem prospect towards evolving a systematic approach to effectively combat the problem with competitive solutions. The absence of such section presents the system to premature failure, strangulation and sudden collapse amidst overwhelming competitive market layout. But why do people resist this change? Firstly, of important is the leadership ability of the chief executive officer in charge of an organization to communicate in clear tone of the imperative need(s) for a proposed change.   An important change is not usually a sudden one. Therefore the process of change towards productive results is in all, the concern of the entire goal driven employees. Employees are left in suspicion of pending job insecurity when sidelined from the activities resulting in the change. A sector of industries who fails to achieve its sole aim of establishment within a stipulated time is a laboratory earmarked to experiment new method for possible productive running (the change). An employee in such stratum who perhaps, would perform better in newly evolving shape of the future of that sector or possibly in another sector within the same organization will do everything possible to resist a planned change with uncertainty of his/her fate afterward. Thirdly, for an employee whose employment in the organization is not grounded on merit, his spirit-willingness conformity to the written words of vision and mission statement of the industries is slack. Nevertheless, meeting the time-limit for each goal and agenda of the organization per time become a big task. On perceiving a proposed change in view, such an employee become convicted by conscience and consider himself a target for elimination while the leadership sees the need for such change in another perspective. In the absence of other alternative, he will try to oppose such change by all means. To relief employee’s anxiety over intending change Employee anxiety towards change is an obstacle to the success of the plan for the evolving new industry. To work out a yielding change, dealing with the anxiety of the employees should be part of the change process. Adequate information on why the change is necessary at such time relieves anxiety, some of such reasons could be proffering the way forward to perhaps, the gross net loss in company’s quarterly report, significant reduction in shareholders’ earnings per share, the urgent need to meet government new policy (and stipulated deadline) with the industry still having a sharp edge among competitive industries, the change in the political landscape indigenous to the company, the company’s readiness to compete on global horizon, seasonal shifts in market forces of demand and supply, among others. In engineering the change, the visionary leadership need not fidget on the outcome of employee’s retrenchment if need be. Such job relief must be done in under standing or/and the protection of such an individual’s right. Towards A learning organization Peter Senges (The Fifth Discipline, n.d) concisely defines learning organization to be corporate activities in an organization that maintain a continuous habit of development per time. A dynamic organization needs to meet the innumerable challenges of thriving in a tasking world of new discoveries. Besides the employees experience as a product from adaptation to the required skills and the economy surroundings in the industry, it is instinctive for man to naturally challenge history, instructions, precepts and possibly look for an easy way to getting still the same result or a better one of compliance in a dynamical economic demand. As part of the learning process, an organization needs to constantly meet the expectation of each individual component of a working team. Incorporation of ‘a learning organization’ scheme is necessary for an organization to evolve its own identity. Such will make it stands irrespective of employees’ inflow and outflow. Towards A successful team In the present century, ranking highest among necessities for a successful organization is a vibrant and cordial working team (American National Representative Survey, 2003). The term teamwork is a cross-breeding of productive efforts towards synergized results. Each member of a team is a living component of such system that produces the common goal. The evolution of a team is oriented in the required result. This informs the creation and kind of such team. In the turmoil of rapid generation of new customers’ demands, individualistic method is insufficient to quench the hunger for urgency and accuracy. A team needs evolve to do the job (Jackson Ruderman, 1996). Types of Team The categories of team instituted is based on three headings; the working area, the task mission, and the time requirement, and leadership structure. Functional Team: here, each integral member is from the same unit Cross-functional Team Team members assemble from various work units to evaluate and resolve common challenges. Mission Team Mission-accomplished Team – The members here prefer and implement solution to developing issues. Developmental Team This team develops new systems and products Duration Team Ad hoc The team is established for pending issues and stand dissolve thereafter the issues are resolved. Permanent Standing team is a permanent part of the work unit or the organization. Decision making of a chief executive amidst competing values Teams are meant to execute clearly mapped out tasks. The chief executive decides the pending task to be performed, assigns the type of team needed and provides the task in the organizational perspective in terms of goal and objectives. The chief executive officer collates various decision resolved by the team and make ultimate decision. It is important that the decisions are first suggested to another round of objective deliberations, the subjective points are discarded for the objective ones. True test of objectivity is measured by the relative strength of a decision over a reasonable long duration after suggestion. How CEO`s behavior is related to his tenure in office Cumulative success and failure of a CEO is a determinant to the length of his tenure duration. More importantly is his reaction to moment of failure. On the other hand, total shareholders returns over given period of years is tested for different CEOs. The CEO behavior to meeting the target of an organization is evident in the profit and consumer satisfaction yields. For different CEOs, their   behaviors is am reflection of industries differences, company’s oriented grooming before appointment or outside orientation in a similar discipline. References Carly Fiorina, Japanese chamber of commerce and industry New York, New York, November 28, 2000 Transforming Companies, Transforming Countries â€Å"Leadership in Organizations† by G. Yukl Chapters 10-13, The annual Booz Allen Hamilton study, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc, 2003. Web site- http://business2-cnet.com.com/CEOs-on-the-firing-line/2030-1069_3-1021971.html OPM, Workforce Performance Newsletter, April 1998 Phil Garrahan and Paul Stewart â€Å"The Nissan Enigma† Chapter 4 published by Mansell in London 1992).